The Single Best Strategy To Use For magic

The Single Best Strategy To Use For magic

Blog Article

What at first appeared evident, is now someplace within just quite a few lines of code. As for becoming spaghettish, AFAIK all respectable contemporary IDEs help it become trivial to locate the value of a relentless variable. Ordinarily can just hover in excess of any use in the variable. As well as again inside the working day, after we didn't have these types of niceties, it absolutely was extremely, incredibly worthwhile, Over time.

If by STL you indicate just the template portion of the C++ Typical Library, then it can be beautifully probable to implement it without any "magic".

Nevertheless, SO really should have the capacity to stand by yourself even though the rest of the World-wide-web disappears! By all means connection to a different source, but I choose to put some meat in The solution at the same time.

Listed here "two" can be a "magic" variety, that's factored out to a symbolic constant default_padding throughout the context with the GUI UX of "my software" as a way to allow it to be use as default_padding quickly comprehended inside the better context on the enclosing code.

Soon after screening most remedies without the need of altering the supply-code, I discovered the following to have python-magic working out on the box:

I haven't found any formally authorized implementations of offsetof, so I am not sure whether they are even attainable.

We'd end here and declare that 2 is okay With this context and there is nothing else we need to know. Having said that, Probably in our software package universe this isn't The complete Tale. There's additional to it, but "padding = 2" to be a context are not able to reveal it.

I am not particularly considering the complex particulars, but mainly in how I brought about it and how I can stop it Later on. Here is some notes on your situation:

– mtvec Commented Aug 26, 2010 at 13:04 three well, Individuals are not in the current Model of your standard. They may be scheduled for inclusion in C++0x (and promptly skimming the draft failed to generate any info on how they could be executed, so you may well be suitable they involve compiler magic to employ -- However, their only goal then is to show this compiler magic so regular developers may well use it. They do not hold it to by themselves like @Occupation's Java examples do.)

A theory that's relevant to magic figures is that each fact your code deals with needs to be declared specifically at the time. If you employ magic numbers in your code (like the password length case in point that @marcio gave, you can certainly wind up duplicating that fact, and Whenever your understand of that reality changes you've a maintenance problem.

Now my concern is: Is that this true? Or are there elements of the STL that can't be carried out in pure C++ and want some "magic"/special compiler aid?

A fast Verify of your magic copyright amount before processing the file or knowledge structure lets a single to sign mistakes early, rather then schlep every one of the way through perhaps lengthy processing so as to announce that the enter was total balderdash.

I feel static remaining constants are overkill when you're making use of them in a single system. A final variable declared at the top of the strategy is much more readable IMHO.

C++0x takes it a person action even more and offers versions of those sort traits that actually perform properly in all cases. And which can only be performed by means of some unspecified form of compiler guidance.